The Warlock said:

there you go…

littleredumbrella.com/2012/01/lets-be-clear-ron-paul-fucking-sucks.html

lol yeah that article doesnt sound bias…

They link up things that Ron Paul has said himself….

Slumerican502 said:

Bezerk I got a 100 that says you didn't bother to watch the speech. The point of me posting this only had a little bit to do with ron paul, because it came out of his mouth. To put it very shortly and bluntly because i'm not going to debate you, this countries dependence on debt because of our federal reserve is driving us into the ground. If you would have listened at the end he gives us a number of ways that we can turn things around. The most important is getting everyone to take responsibility for their lives, secondly to spread awareness as Americans (using the internet) to other citizens as much as you possibly can so we can unite together when we do finally hit that wall. Which we will.

 

Btw I do actually agree with the bi-partisan bullshit that you speak of. But this two party system won't last forever, mark my words. People ARE starting to wake up.

 

Judging by your posts I think I have you nailed. You are the type that goes into forums and youtube comments and starts talking shit without really reading into what the topic is. I bet you use words like “sheeple” alot because you think you are ahead of the curve…..You my friend are the fucking hipster. Calling Ron Paul a racist, creating a “Straw Man” argument to take away from really what the topic was about. It had nothing to do with Rons integrity….Ok i'm done now

<<<This guy has never used the word sheeple, and is the first time I've ever heard this term.

BeZerk said:

Lucem Ferre said:

scruffy said:

not watching the video, cuz ive seen him do it before. 

normally, i dont much like republicans.  citizens, that is, i dont really like many politicians at all, any party. 

paul is an exception, the rare republican who doesnt come off as, well, a republican. 

I thought he was a Libertarian.

He runs as a republican for one reason and one reason only. People in America are bipartisan only. They'll vote for republican or democrat blindly, so if you run as a republican (which his views are more like), you're more likely to pick up a bunch of bias votes on the logic “oh that dude is republican.” Jesse Ventura did this in Minnesota, running as a Republican, then switching over to Independent shortly after (or vice versa).

Because of this is why he ran. If he said half of the things he did in politics while not in politics….people would have called him a conspiracy theorist. Don't twist shit around. His final speech (if you even did listen to it) is pointing out how politics in America are not working. 

My Cabal senses are tingling….and something tells me Bezerk is a FIB

I agree Knutty, boxing yourself in a political party is stupid.

IsaacB, the weird thing is that the Anarchists would be dooming themselves by not voting because the less power we use the more power the government has.

BeZerk, you are an idiot. You come here with your egotistical know it all attitude calling everybody hipsters and idiots over complete stupidity. First off, this thread is not about supporting Ron Paul, it’s about his amazing speech. Regardless if whether his (lol) racist or not his speech was pretty amazing. By the way, the websites that you did your “research” on aren’t very reputable.

BeZerk, Huntington post is a liberal news source. Of course they are biased so they will go out of their way to slander politicians of other parties. All though Ron is a Liberal, he calls himself a Republican there for they will slander him for being a Republican. The actual article is a complete joke of an article and was made completely to slander Ron. First thing that proves this is do you think Ron really runs that specific twitter account? I don’t think ICP even runs their own news letter anymore. Second off. every single one of those tweets have high chances of being taken out of context. There is reason why they only post the tweets and not the whole news letters. If it wasn’t taken out of context and the news letters are actually that racist then why go after the twitter account and not go after the news letter it’s self. Come on, this is basic stuff on how to trick stupid people in politics, take stuff out of context.

As for  your second bit of “research”, BeZerk. The Little Red Umbrella is not a fucking news source, it’s an arts and culture website. It’s not even a fucking political website. Nothing about this website should even be taken as fact since the website is about stating opinions. Funny thing is that just from looking at photos on this website it seems to be run by stereotypical hipsters. The article it’s self is pathetic. The person who wrote the article (who by the way has no actual credentials for being a political news bringer) was completely unprofessional. The biggest thing that debunks this article is that the writer has NO FUCKING CITATIONS. He makes none. No in text citations, no works cited part of the article, no citations at all. What does that mean? It means there is no proof that Ron said that, it means that it’s possible that those quotes were just made up on the spot. It means that all I need to do to get you to believe that somebody said something is throw quotes around the phrase. In early 2013 BeZerk said in his 5 paragraph rant, “I am a complete idiot”. Look, I just did exactly what that website did. I guess it’s true then, you admitted that you are an idiot. Well, at least you will believe it because I threw quotations in there. Quotations.

There you go BeZerk, you just proved to everybody that you are the gullible dumb ass who does his “research” on hipster culture websites.