WHEN YOU SIGN AN EXECUTIVE ORDER TELLING AMERICANS "I JUST CANCELED YOUR JOB" PEOPLE WILL REMEMBER THAT!

KLF also doesn't want to talk about Biden halting work on the border wall. I wonder why...

King Lucem Ferre said
When nothing you said contradicted what I said and you're just yelling at the wind like an autist. LMAO

https://www.zippia.com/advice/trump-border-wall-jobs/

https://money.com/the-wall-will-create-thousands-of-new-jobs-but-there-could-be-a-catch/
 

According to them the wall will create literally zero new construction jobs

And WTF are these two articles basing the wild claim on that CONTINUING to BUILD THE WALL will create ZERO NEW JOBS FOR NEW PEOPLE TO HAVE?

Well, the answer, according to two experts is actually zero.

The timeline for the wall has it being finished in 2020, and with the prototypes’ construction being delayed until 2018, that means that it will have to be completed in less than three years.

That’s not enough time to train workers, so it won’t “create” jobs, as this project will require already-skilled laborers.

https://www.zippia.com/advice/trump-border-wall-jobs/

This is literally one of the most retarded things I have ever read. Most race baiting, regressive liberal trash usually is sub-par in terms of logic and common sense.

What is this mythical timeline? Who created it? Why is it set in stone? Why can't it be moved? How do we know that this DEADLINE that he writes about wasn't just an ESTIMATION? And what body did it come from? ALL THESE IMPORTANT PHILOSOPHICAL QUESTIONS ARE NOT ANSWERED. And KLF sure as fuck doesn't have the brains to understand the necessity of having these questions answered. It's almost like clarity is something he wants to avoid. I wonder why...

And at a time when general contractors everywhere are struggling to find skilled workers as it is, getting workers who are vetted for government projects at all will be a challenge.

So a government body can't just look at a person's employment history, skill set and say, "yep, you're hired?" LOL. Why do regressive liberals always act like it's so difficult to build a border wall or control the type of immigrants that come in?

There’s no high-level construction firm interested in the project

In fact, only three of the top 20 ranked contractors as ranked by the Engineering News-Record’s most recent Top 400 Contractors list were listed as interested vendors on those RFPs.

The projects are simply too contentious for too little a payoff, with legislators in states like New York and California even going so far as to propose bills blacklisting companies that participate — and while they didn’t pass, they’re a solid indication of how public sentiment can work against the company with the dubious honor of building the wall.

And HERE'S THE PROBLEM RIGHT HERE. LIBERAL STATES ARE ATTACKING COMPANIES THAT WANT TO HELP SECURE THE BORDER! IT'S THE FAULT OF THE LEFTIES!  Maybe if the Democrats SHUT THEIR FUCKING MOUTHS AND LET THE REPUBLICANS DO THEIR JOB OF SECURING THE BORDER, THIS MESS WOULD ALREADY BE OVER AND IT WOULD ALREADY BE BUILT!

Funny how KLF loves to dig up sources that end up having the very answers and reasons to the questions as to why certain problems exist. Turns out, the Democrats are fucking shit up again.

Remember guys, walls and borders are racist. Even if middle and lower class blacks are asking for it and are realizing that liberal race baiting ISN'T PROTECTING THEM WILL RACIST MS-13 GANG MEMBERS ASSASSINATE BLACKS AND EVEN CALL THEM N#$@ERS AS THEY KILL THEM. Because you know, many Mexicans think they are racially superior given their lack of melanin compared to blacks.

How much do you liberals care about those black lives now, with your desire to let gangsters in that could potentially kill more black people? I've already talked about how Mexican gangs are a danger to black lives. But liberals like KLF don't want to hear it. They don't want to hear about mutually exclusive minorities.

Now after the article bitches about avocados, and food trucks that feed workers, (more jobs created for food truckers that ironically KLF doesn't want to talk about, haha), it says this:

Of course, this isn’t a comprehensive report.

NO FUCKING SHIT!

Our focus here was to highlight that it’s largely useless in terms of long-term economic job growth.

So because these jobs won't stick around for as long as THEY RANDOMLY, WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION OR REASON, THINK THEY SHOULD EXIST, they just say, it's not worth it to have these jobs so stop trying to finish building the wall. Because we say so.

Why don't they go tell that to all the victims of illegal immigrant crime? Especially the BLACK MEN AND WOMEN who died from illegal Mexican gangsters?

This is all just pointless virtue signaling from liberal idiots who in their alleged infinite wisdom have decided these jobs, however long they may last and need to exist until the wall is done, AREN'T WORTH CREATING. Simply because they say so. These construction jobs won't last long so don't create them and don't give these construction contracts out. Well by that logic, no construction workers will ever be needed to do anything ever again because their jobs won't last past when the construction job is done. That's literally what their argument boils down to.  LOL.  NO CONSTRUCTION JOB LASTS FOREVER. AND SOME LAST LONGER THAN OTHERS? SO WHAT? THAT'S NOT A JUSTIFICATION FOR NOT HAVING SHORTER LASTING CONTRACTS-JOBS! YOU DO ONE JOB AND MOVE ON TO THE NEXT! DUH! THAT'S HOW CONSTRUCTION WORKS!!!

Why do I have to explain how construction industry works to a grown man like KLF?

Watch the goal posts get moved with this other article. I love when the fallacies come early on. It's hilarious.

Michael Montgomery, a consultant who helps developers estimate their projects’ economic impact, says a building project on the scale of Trump’s speculative wall should create between 21,200 and 25,600 jobs for “at least the period of construction,” basing his estimate on the $12 billion to $15 billion budget mentioned by Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell.

Those won’t necessarily be new jobs — already-employed construction and manufacturing employees will inevitably take some of the work, he says. But the positions, which include everything from the manufacturers making its materials to the cooks feeding the workforce, would be “substantially if not entirely supported” by that existing GOP budget estimate.

https://money.com/the-wall-will-create-thousands-of-new-jobs-but-there-could-be-a-catch/

But some COULD be new jobs. And they still can't explain WHAT'S WRONG with keeping currently employed people...FURTHER EMPLOYED? Why is this a bad thing?

Nobody is saying it's bad, vinyl.

Good, then YOU HAVE NO POINT!

There’s one caveat, though. The U.S. is currently in the midst of a construction labor shortage as housing developers work to bring supply back in line with demand. That will make it difficult to fill those job with legal labor, says Juli Smith, president of the engineering and architecture executive search firm Smith Consulting group.

Without a documented workforce available, construction supervisors will be forced to use low-paid, “undocumented immigrant workers,” Smith says.

There are other potential ways Trump’s anti-immigration efforts could generate more jobs; Trump has announced plans to boost the border patrol, for instance. But the salaries of border patrol agents and customs officers are already one of the highest-priced line items on the Department of Homeland Security’s budget, so such an increase would fly in the face of his long-held promise to massively cut government spending (and, in turn, the federal workforce).

I'm sure the Republicans can re-allocate the money or find it somewhere. And since they've manged to build as much of the wall as they have, I don't see why they can't continue. Oh yeah. Biden's in the white house and he halted the border wall construction.

Of course, if Trump convinces the Mexican government to pay for the wall, goading the country to use its own labor and materials to build it, the whole jobs stimulus would benefit workers on the south side of the border.

Didn't you fucking idiots just say that you didn't think there were enough American workers to get the job done? So why are you now turning around and bitching that some Mexicans may be building the wall for the benefit of America?

But don’t hold your breath waiting for Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto to bow to Trump’s demands, says Michael Camuñez, president and CEO at ManattJones Global Strategies, and a former assistant secretary of Commerce under President Barack Obama.

“Mexico is not going to pay for that wall, and Mexicans are not going to build it,” Camuñez says. “That would be the equivalent of asking an East Berliner to willingly construct the wall that cuts them off from the world. It’s outrageous.”

Okay, fair enough.

So ultimately, Mexico won't do it, and America isn't able to do it because they don't have it in the budget. Well considering this article was written in 2017, Trump's second term ran up to 2020. And to act like in three years, more of the wall didn't bet built between 2017 and 2020, is ASININE! So CLEARLY, the people and funds were available! Again, in 2021, Biden stopped the wall construction. Now we can bitch over how many new jobs may have been created, or how many more formerly employed people would have kept their jobs, but this is to just admit that halting border construction means WORK WILL RUN OUT FOR THOSE WHO WERE PREVIOUSLY EMPLOYED. So workers are losing work and income either way.

So again, my point still stands. You kill the wall, you kill jobs.