Drunkalo said
Im not buying it. Why utilize a system so aggressively that you deem so flawed?

I believe the whoop count will be removed, but not till she/you beat out Scruffy and OMD. Then it will be frozen and 'if we get rid of it there will be other programming issues'.

Ive heard differently about her 0 whoops given.

So if what you say is correct then rewind it to the way it was 2 years ago and put Shaman back on the list and be done with it. Or just manipulate the numbers (as what happened to the zero whoop count) and be done with it. 

You can take me off the list also, so it doesnt seem like im upset for not being there. Please do.  

I can't manipulate the whoop count from the back end. I do not have database write permissions. I can only set up read-only SQL queries and even then I only have read access to certain public tables - for instance, I do not have access to any private sections like PMs and such. I do have access to the user table but things like passwords are stored in an SHA256 asymmetrical one-way hash to prevent password compromise through SQL queries.

Her whoop count of 0 is because she doesn't use the whoop system. 

I like the whoop system as a "like" button since it prevents posts like "+1" or "I agree". I am just not big on the ranking thing. I never whooped her much before she appeared in the Top Whooped section. I didn't get her there. 

It is easy to remove the Ranking part of the plugin. That part was an additional setting and not part of the default. The default setting is only inline of the post being whooped. A few clicks in the management console and the Top Whooped and Whoop count under the avatar goes away. 

King Lucem Ferre said
Fuck the whoops. It doesn't matter.

Psyral Infection said
The ad he posted wished death upon murderers, muggers, and rapist, not them specifically. It was a request for the reinstatement of the death penalty.

At what point did we cross the line from the fine and noble pursuit of genuine civil liberties to the reckless an dangerously permissive atmosphere which allows criminals of every age to beat and rape a helpless woman and then laugh at her family’s anguish?

Wow, what a coincidental statement. It's almost as if anybody with common sense knows that was about the Central Park 5 and the whole thing was a response to them.

Almost as if Psyral is pushing a dishonest narrative to cover for his fucked up president.  

AGAIN! NOT pushing a dishonest narrative. I even said I disagreed with the Trump on this. The guys should not have been imprisoned for rape. 

BUT also, he was referring to a recent string of rapes, muggings and murders in New York's Central Park at the time. The "Five" did not "laugh" at any victim's family's anguish. "And why do they laugh? They laugh because they know that soon, very soon, they will be returned to the streets to rape and maim and kill once again" The "Five" didn't laugh at anyone. They hadn't even gone to trial yet.

The "Five" did not murder anyone. "They should be forced to suffer and, when they kill, they should be executed for their crimes" ... "I want to hate these murderers and I always will" . Again, they did not murder anyone.

According to police records, a group of about 40 people mostly between the ages of 14 and 16 were roaming New York's Central Park committing various crimes from assault, robbery, and rape. Only 10 of them were ever imprisoned during the crime sprees at that time.

Trump's article was a plea to bring back the death penalty during a time of very high violent crimes gripping the city. 

While the actual rape should not have been pinned on the "Five" due to improper procedure in obtaining confessions. The "Five" were not completely innocent. On the drive to the precinct, Raymond Santana of the "Five" told police, "I had nothing to do with the rape. All I did was feel the woman’s tits." The cops didn't even know about the rape yet, they only knew about the assault. Also, Korey Wise told Melody Jackson (who went to police about it), that he didn’t rape the jogger but only held her legs down. 

Take what you want from that but I still don't see his article being directed at the "Five" but at the recent killings, rapes, and muggings in Central Park at the time. One rape and murder happening on April 17, 1989 just 2 days before the Trisha Meili assault and rape. On that date (19th) alone, there were 6 other assault and robberies in Central Park against Michael Vigna, Antonio Diaz, David Goode, Robert Garner, David Lewis and John Loughlin all in separate instances. The city was currently gripped in heavy violent crime. 

Still don't see any reference to race in the article except when he talked about New York families that he said were White, Black, Hispanic and Asian who were unable to enjoy walks through the park at dusk.

So how was I pushing a dishonest narrative, @lucem-ferre ?