Log In
Sign Up
Home
1:41 am
September 18, 2012
Offline
Pigg said
Krunk, there's no way you are as smart as you claim you are and still acting this dumb in good faith.
You must be intentionally misleading people.
Smart people can be stupid as fuck sometimes.
Whoop Whoop King Lucem Ferre :
kukluxklown 
9:39 am
March 30, 2013
Offline
Yes, Krunk has some Double D's alright: Desperate Delusions. But at least shes sticking to the whole Peach theme!
On an unrelated note, I discovered a secret attack on the original Final Fantasy.
Whoop Whoop Old Mr Dangerous :
kukluxklown10:00 am
April 7, 2018
Offline
butthurt b like
Rumor with the pirates is that U.S. criminal elites are trying to buy New Zealand & Israeli citizenship to avoid extradition for their treason, & this recent Congressional spergathon was yet another attempt to shield them from the gallows.
Whoop Whoop Q :
kukluxklown |
10:18 am
March 30, 2013
Offline
I guess I'm not the only one making the peach joke..
Whoop Whoop Old Mr Dangerous :
kukluxklown10:46 am
Moderators
February 15, 2014
Offline
Pigg said
It's not fantasy though. He is impeached. He will always be impeached. Forever.
Even if he isn't removed from office, this is (another) horrible blight upon his presidency.
It's all part of the plan. Trust the Plan! It's not a "blight", it's a badge of honor.
WWG1WGA!
Whoop Whoop Psyral :
kukluxklown
2:42 pm
Moderators
February 15, 2014
Offline
King Lucem Ferre said
No, he's still impeached. There's no erasing it. It is what it is and will always be it even if you think it's bullshit. He's impeached....
Pigg said
It's not fantasy though. He is impeached. He will always be impeached. Forever....
More is coming out about that among constitutional scholars and judges.
While Art. I, Sec. 2, Clause 5 says that the House of Representatives "shall have the sole Power of Impeachment." It also suggests that the process is not complete at the vote but at the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial. Without the articles being sent, he may not yet be impeached. Some are also arguing that if the Senate votes for immediate dismissal without trial, it can void the impeachment. Since impeachment is only an indictment (declaration of accusation of charges), dismissal can remove it if legal misconduct during the indictment processes is found.
Question is, do you think that no legal misconduct will be found against Schiff during the process?
Yes, it may hold. Maybe they don't find any legal or prosecutional misconduct during the indictment processes. But will it make it through the dismissal? Only needs a simple majority vote for that. If not dismissed, will it make it though to conviction? 2/3rds needed for that.
Impeachment is only the declaration of accusation. With this partisan precedent, I see impeachments against every future president when the majority house party differs from the executive party. It will now forever be a political weapon. One that will be used many times over.
Not that it matters. Impeachment (whether it goes through or not) has been the BEST thing to happen to Trump. It has increased his fundraising to record-breaking levels that have never been seen before. It is going to ensure his re-election in 2020 and hopefully give Republicans a super majority in both Senate and House which will change the nature of politics in this country forever. They will "fix" the broken system in the way they see fit and there will be NOTHING that can be done about it especially with the Supreme Court leaning Republican and soon to probably lean further. YAY !!! What a great time to be alive.
I believe these are the death throws of the Democratic party and it will hurt them more than they realize.
I have said before that I never liked the idea of 1 party with majority in all branches but with everything that has happened in the last 3 years, I am not only hoping for a majority, but for a super majority that will destroy all future hopes of the democratic, socialist, and/or communist parties.
All hail the re-emergence of the Republic! This mob-rule democracy must be destroyed for the future of the Republic.
Whoop Whoop Psyral :
the_patriot_smack, kukluxklown3:13 pm
March 30, 2018
Offline
Harvard Law School professor Noah Feldman, who testified as a Democrat witness in the House Judiciary Committee’s public hearings on impeachment, argues President Donald Trump is technically not impeached until the House submits the articles to the Senate.
Feldman writes the definition of impeachment, according to the framers, “assumed that impeachment was a process, not just a House vote,” and impeachment is official only when the articles are transmitted to the Senate, where lawmakers are “obliged by the Constitution to hold a trial.
King Lucem Ferre said
No, he's still impeached. There's no erasing it. It is what it is and will always be it even if you think it's bullshit. He's impeached....Pigg said
It's not fantasy though. He is impeached. He will always be impeached. Forever....
Whoop Whoop the_patriot_smack :
kukluxklown, PsyralTHE ALMIGHTY SMACK
3:24 pm
August 10, 2017
Offline
Whoop Whoop Drunkalo :
kukluxklown, Old Mr DangerousYeah bitches, im that short gentleman mentioned in that youtube video.
And the very nice, level headed guy from that other youtube video.
4:55 pm
June 24, 2016
Offline
YOU SHEEPALOS ARE LOST.
POLYTRICKS ARE A SCAM
BOTH SIDES RIGGED
SOAP OPERA THEATRICS
REAL JUGGALOS DONT VOTE
REAL JUGGALOS OPPOSE ILLUMINATI AND THEIR DECEPTION
CARRY ON SHEEPALOS!
CARRY ON
5:01 pm
May 4, 2014
Offline
 |
 |
 |
"Democrats HAVE NOT IMPEACHED Trump, Democrats OWN Witness Undermines Pelosi's Strategy" Tim Pool
Whoop Whoop krunk :
Psyral |
 |
 |
5:23 pm
March 30, 2013
Offline
I think it's actually "desty throes". Could be wrong. Too lazy to Google.
6:04 pm
May 4, 2014
Offline
FTFOMF Peach judges u.
|
|
|
6:27 pm
September 18, 2012
Offline
"According to a guy he's not impeached."
Nah, he's impeached. Not that it actually means anything as far as I can tell. Other than the fact that it obviously upsets you.
6:30 pm
August 10, 2017
Offline
Ftfomf isn't a real peach, I call foul.
Wanna use some impeachment paper to wipe your eyes?
https://thepioneerwoman.com/food-and-friends/7-reasons-to-use-parchment-paper/
Yeah bitches, im that short gentleman mentioned in that youtube video.
And the very nice, level headed guy from that other youtube video.
6:42 pm
May 4, 2014
Offline
|
|
|
6:45 pm
September 18, 2012
Offline
krunkazphuk said
I do like bananas. Do monkeys eat peaches?
10:31 pm
March 30, 2013
Offline
We can all just lie back and observe the actual PROOF now, that the married couple, Psyral and Krunk, are insane or at least pretending to be.
10:48 pm
April 25, 2017
Offline
King Lucem Ferre said
No, he's still impeached. There's no erasing it. It is what it is and will always be it even if you think it's bullshit. He's impeached.
Wrong.
Trump Isn’t Impeached Until the House Tells the Senate
The Constitution doesn’t say how fast the articles must go to the Senate. Some modest delay is not inconsistent with the Constitution, or how both chambers usually work.
But an indefinite delay would pose a serious problem. Impeachment as contemplated by the Constitution does not consist merely of the vote by the House, but of the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial. Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment. And the Senate must actually hold a trial.
If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.
That’s because “impeachment” under the Constitution means the House sending its approved articles of to the Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached.
As for the headlines we saw after the House vote saying, “TRUMP IMPEACHED,” those are a media shorthand, not a technically correct legal statement. So far, the House has voted to impeach (future tense) Trump. He isn’t impeached (past tense) until the articles go to the Senate and the House members deliver the message.
Once the articles are sent, the Senate has a constitutional duty to hold a trial on the impeachment charges presented. Failure for the Senate to hold a trial after impeachment would deviate from the Constitution’s clear expectation.
For the House to vote “to impeach” without ever sending the articles of impeachment to the Senate for trial would also deviate from the constitutional protocol. It would mean that the president had not genuinely been impeached under the Constitution; and it would also deny the president the chance to defend himself in the Senate that the Constitution provides.
The point was made by Laura Ingraham. Watch from 0:00 to 9:00
The Ingraham Angle 12/19/19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvTPxapdnZA
OOPS. Looks like EVERYONE ON YOUTUBE who has this December 19 show has had their video reduced to 2 seconds. LOOKS LIKE THE SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS AT YOUTUBE DONT' WANT THIS TO GET OUT!!! Do a google video search of
Ingraham Angle 12/19/19
and see all the results. Click on every youtube result.
EVERY VIDEO HAS BEEN REDUCED TO 0:02 SECONDS! CONSPIRACY!
10:56 pm
March 30, 2013
Offline
Sshhh.
11:32 pm
September 18, 2012
Offline
vinyllover said
King Lucem Ferre said
No, he's still impeached. There's no erasing it. It is what it is and will always be it even if you think it's bullshit. He's impeached.Wrong.
Trump Isn’t Impeached Until the House Tells the Senate
According to the Constitution, impeachment is a process, not a vote. ByDecember 19, 2019, 3:35 PM CSTNow that the House of Representatives has voted to impeach President Donald Trump, what is the constitutional status of the two articles of impeachment? Must they be transmitted to the Senate to trigger a trial, or could they be held back by the House until the Senate decides what the trial will look like, as Speaker Nancy Pelosi has hinted?
The Constitution doesn’t say how fast the articles must go to the Senate. Some modest delay is not inconsistent with the Constitution, or how both chambers usually work.
But an indefinite delay would pose a serious problem. Impeachment as contemplated by the Constitution does not consist merely of the vote by the House, but of the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial. Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment. And the Senate must actually hold a trial.If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.
That’s because “impeachment” under the Constitution means the House sending its approved articles of to the Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached.As for the headlines we saw after the House vote saying, “TRUMP IMPEACHED,” those are a media shorthand, not a technically correct legal statement. So far, the House has voted to impeach (future tense) Trump. He isn’t impeached (past tense) until the articles go to the Senate and the House members deliver the message.
Once the articles are sent, the Senate has a constitutional duty to hold a trial on the impeachment charges presented. Failure for the Senate to hold a trial after impeachment would deviate from the Constitution’s clear expectation.
For the House to vote “to impeach” without ever sending the articles of impeachment to the Senate for trial would also deviate from the constitutional protocol. It would mean that the president had not genuinely been impeached under the Constitution; and it would also deny the president the chance to defend himself in the Senate that the Constitution provides.
The point was made by Laura Ingraham. Watch from 0:00 to 9:00
The Ingraham Angle 12/19/19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvTPxapdnZA
OOPS. Looks like EVERYONE ON YOUTUBE who has this December 19 show has had their video reduced to 2 seconds. LOOKS LIKE THE SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS AT YOUTUBE DONT' WANT THIS TO GET OUT!!! Do a google video search of
Ingraham Angle 12/19/19
and see all the results. Click on every youtube result.
EVERY VIDEO HAS BEEN REDUCED TO 0:02 SECONDS! CONSPIRACY!
Can you cite the part of the constitution that actually says this so I'm not reading some guy that swears it's in the constitution with out a source of what part of the constitution says it? Other wise it's just complete and total bullshit I'm supposed to take at this guy's word, which as previously noted, I won't do.
All RSSMost Users Ever Online: 591
Currently Online:
65 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
The Warlock: 11663
King Lucem Ferre: 9098
Old Mr Dangerous: 8974
krunk: 8060
OCJ_Brendan: 6148
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 755
Members: 3743
Moderators: 6
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 5
Forums: 28
Topics: 12299
Posts: 245363
Newest Members:
Philipesodo, JaneHor, THC Drinks, Jammek, GloriaIcomeModerators: GanjaGoblin: 2873, Psyral: 4297, bozodklown: 394, scruffy: 11447, PunkRockJuggalo: 6559, Pigg: 6492
Administrators: admin: 1, ScottieD: 845
