April 25, 2024
71 Guests and 1 Member Online

Please consider Sign Uping
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Sign Up

Sign Up | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

HatchetmanPolitics
Trump’s election consultants filmed saying they use bribes and sex workers to entrap politicians
March 19, 2018
4:41 pm
Pigg
Pigg
영덕, South Korea
Moderator
Moderators

Members
Forum Posts: 6492
Member Since:
August 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
March 19, 2018
4:42 pm
Pigg
Pigg
영덕, South Korea
Moderator
Moderators

Members
Forum Posts: 6492
Member Since:
August 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Senior executives at Cambridge Analytica – the data company that credits itself with Donald Trump’s presidential victory – have been secretly filmed saying they could entrap politicians in compromising situations with bribes and Ukrainian sex workers.

In an undercover investigation by Channel 4 News, the company’s chief executive Alexander Nix said the British firm secretly campaigns in elections across the world. This includes operating through a web of shadowy front companies, or by using sub-contractors.

In one exchange, when asked about digging up material on political opponents, Mr Nix said they could “send some girls around to the candidate’s house”, adding that Ukrainian girls “are very beautiful, I find that works very well”.

In another he said: “We’ll offer a large amount of money to the candidate, to finance his campaign in exchange for land for instance, we’ll have the whole thing recorded, we’ll blank out the face of our guy and we post it on the Internet.”

Offering bribes to public officials is an offence under both the UK Bribery Act and the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Cambridge Analytica operates in the UK and is registered in the United States.

The admissions were filmed at a series of meetings at London hotels over four months, between November 2017 and January 2018. An undercover reporter for Channel 4 News posed as a fixer for a wealthy client hoping to get candidates elected in Sri Lanka.

Mr Nix told our reporter: “…we’re used to operating through different vehicles, in the shadows, and I look forward to building a very long-term and secretive relationship with you.”

Along with Mr Nix, the meetings also included Mark Turnbull, the managing director of CA Political Global, and the company’s chief data officer, Dr Alex Tayler.

Mr Turnbull described how, having obtained damaging material on opponents, Cambridge Analytica can discreetly push it onto social media and the internet.

He said: “… we just put information into the bloodstream of the internet, and then, and then watch it grow, give it a little push every now and again… like a remote control. It has to happen without anyone thinking, ‘that’s propaganda’, because the moment you think ‘that’s propaganda’, the next question is, ‘who’s put that out?’.”

Mr Nix also said: “…Many of our clients don’t want to be seen to be working with a foreign company… so often we set up, if we are working then we can set up fake IDs and websites, we can be students doing research projects attached to a university, we can be tourists, there’s so many options we can look at. I have lots of experience in this.”

In the meetings, the executives boasted that Cambridge Analytica and its parent company Strategic Communications Laboratories (SCL) had worked in more than two hundred elections across the world, including Nigeria, Kenya, the Czech Republic, India and Argentina.

The company is at the centre of a scandal over its role in the harvesting of more than 50 million Facebook profiles.

Chief executive Mr Nix has also been accused of misleading a parliamentary select committee, which is now asking him to provide further information. He has denied the allegations.

Tonight, a Cambridge Analytica spokesman said: “We entirely refute any allegation that Cambridge Analytica or any of its affiliates use entrapment, bribes, or so-called “honey-traps” for any purpose whatsoever… We routinely undertake conversations with prospective clients to try to tease out any unethical or illegal intentions…”

They said: “Cambridge Analytica does not use untrue material for any purpose.”

And they insisted that opposition research and intelligence gathering, the use of subcontractors and working discreetly with clients are all common practice and legitimate.

This report is Part Two of a Channel 4 News series, ‘Data, Democracy and Dirty Tricks’, investigating Cambridge Analytica.

Part Three, on the company’s work in the United States, will be broadcast at 7pm tomorrow (Tuesday, 20 March 2018). You can watch Part One here.

March 19, 2018
5:30 pm
Avatar
krunk
dirtball
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 8175
Member Since:
May 4, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Pigg said 
... What are your thoughts?  

Could be the latest installment of globalist propaganda, since last July BBC implied that Cambridge Analytica may have hijacked the Brexit vote because their data might "know you better than you know yourself".

YouTube Video Did Cambridge Analytica play a role in the EU referendum? - BBC Newsnight 

I'm with all the flyover Americans & British citizens who value personal liberty. I'll own my choice of Trump over this bubble-wrapped harpy:

 

DYqKmDbX0AYu1dD.jpgImage Enlarger

Whoop Whoop krunk :

Psyral
  RAFtn26.gif 3hm5B2c.gif VFyFLdU.gif  

                              

March 20, 2018
2:38 am
Noah Fence
Noah Fence
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3110
Member Since:
July 28, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

What's a globalist? The alt right people you love say it's a Jew who secretly controls the world. What's your definition?

If you really believed that all lives matter we wouldn't need to say black lives matter

March 20, 2018
7:19 am
Avatar
Psyral
#ModBot
Moderator
Members

Moderators
Forum Posts: 4297
Member Since:
February 15, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I define a globalist is someone who promotes globalism.

The definition by neo-liberal political scientist, Joseph Nye, is that globalism refers to any description and explanation of a world which is characterized by networks of connections that span multi-continental distances; while globalization refers to the increase or decline in the degree of globalism.
That is the all encompassing idea. It can usually be broken down into subsections like market globalism, social globalism, cultural globalism, political globalism, etc.. It is the political globalism that I, as a Republican, in the classic sense of being a supporter of Plato's definition of a Republic, am against. When I speak of globalism or globalists, I am generally refering to political globalism/ists.

I don't think a persons religion, or lack thereof, or their particular "race" if you define "Jew" as a race, has anything to do with globalism with the exception of it being possible that some globalists may fit into that person's definition of "Jew". I don't think either one of us love anyone in the "alt-right". I do associate with some online but I disagree with them on many issues and agree with them only on a few. It is usually the political populism vs political globalism views with which I agree, as opposed to any other populism vs globalism subsets.

I sometimes agree with the non-globalist views on economic globalism. While I don't disagree with all of the ideas of market globalism, I do have issues with economic globalism and the idea of global centralized banking. I understand that, to some extent, that globalistic centralized banking is already here but I am still opposed to the idea.

(click image for source)   Yeah.gif   (click image for source)
March 20, 2018
9:51 am
Avatar
krunk
dirtball
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 8175
Member Since:
May 4, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Noah Fence said
What's a globalist? The alt right people you love say it's a Jew who secretly controls the world. What's your definition?  

I did love the alt-right before white nationalists hijacked the movement with the MSM's help, but now it's just as tedious as leftist, broad-spectrum ignorance. Here's what they used to be:

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/.....alt-right/

And I define a globalist (which I spent two semesters writing about in detail in that pesky thing called college... that thing that seems to trigger the drug slobs on here...) as either an oligarchic gangster who wants to sell the world

Hillary-Queen-of-the-Flies.jpgImage Enlarger

or an enslaved useful idiot that doesn't realize their brain is at the disposal of said gangster(s)

Useful-Idiot.jpgImage Enlarger

 

. I'm guessing ur a useful idiot.

Whoop Whoop krunk :

cacophonousAntiquarian, Psyral
  RAFtn26.gif 3hm5B2c.gif VFyFLdU.gif  

                              

March 20, 2018
2:08 pm
Avatar
krunk
dirtball
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 8175
Member Since:
May 4, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Pigg said 

...The company is at the centre of a scandal over its role in the harvesting of more than 50 million Facebook profiles...

http://thehill.com/opinion/tec.....s-to-trump

"In 2012, The Guardian reported that President Obama’s reelection team was “building a vast digital data operation that for the first time combines a unified database on millions of Americans with the power of Facebook to target individual voters to a degree never achieved before.”

What, exactly, would Obama be doing? According to The Guardian, Obama’s new database would be gathered by asking individual volunteers to log into Obama’s reelection site using their Facebook credentials. “Consciously or otherwise,” The Guardian states, “the individual volunteer will be injecting all the information they store publicly on their Facebook page — home location, date of birth, interests and, crucially, network of friends — directly into the central Obama database.”

Facebook had no problem with such activity then. They do now. There’s a reason for that. The former Obama director of integration and media analytics stated that, during the 2012 campaign, Facebook allowed the Obama team to “suck out the whole social graph”; Facebook “was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn’t stop us once they realized that was what we were doing.” She added, “They came to [the] office in the days following election recruiting & were very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.”"

So...

Is anyone really surprised?

 

What are your thoughts?

Whoop Whoop krunk :

Psyral
  RAFtn26.gif 3hm5B2c.gif VFyFLdU.gif  

                              

Forum Timezone: America/Chicago

Most Users Ever Online: 591

Currently Online: winin84724
98 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

The Warlock: 11663

King Lucem Ferre: 9098

Old Mr Dangerous: 8974

krunk: 8060

OCJ_Brendan: 6148

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 755

Members: 3743

Moderators: 6

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 5

Forums: 28

Topics: 12299

Posts: 245363

Newest Members:

winin84724, Nelsonprato, Weed Tinctures, DavidLem, MichaelDes

Moderators: GanjaGoblin: 2873, Psyral: 4297, bozodklown: 394, scruffy: 11447, PunkRockJuggalo: 6559, Pigg: 6492

Administrators: admin: 1, ScottieD: 845