10:23 am
April 25, 2017
Well considering that his new album was supposed to come out in December after ICP's FFF dropped in October, but they pushed it back AGAIN, just because they pushed FFF back, and considering that Joe Bruce also forbade Lyte to be on the the UGA project with Twiztid and Tech 9, at least one of those actions by Joe Bruce may have violated the contract Lyte signed and so Lyte may have been, or may be talking to a lawyer.
Watch this. Keep in mind that this was BEFORE FFF got pushed back. 1 hour 38 seconds.
Joe Bruce is acting like a fucking bitch. Chuck Reeves is on the money once again.
10:30 am
June 24, 2016
10:46 am
April 18, 2017
vinyllover said
I dunno, but here's an irrelevant video. I have no opinions of my own. Derp.
You just don't get it. GTFO. I 100% guarantee you that no one is going to watch that. Especially since you say:
vinyllover said
Well considering that his new album was supposed to come out in December after ICP's FFF dropped in October, but they pushed it back AGAIN, just because they pushed FFF back, and considering that Joe Bruce also forbade Lyte to be on the the UGA project with Twiztid and Tech 9, at least one of those actions by Joe Bruce may have violated the contract Lyte signed and so Lyte may have been, or may be talking to a lawyer.
1. So it was stated by Bukshot that Billy Bill was the one who pulled the trigger on the UGA feature, and Bukshot speculated that was direct orders from J. This was never confirmed.
2. Tech N9ne is not relevant to that situation whatsoever. Why didn't you bring up King Iso? He's on that track. Or are you just trying to incite extra drama between the major players? Of course you are.
3. "May" = not confirmed. Keep in mind that Reeves said that Gutterwater got pulled because it MAY have had an uncleared sample, and had copyright violations with Gang Green's album name and Nirvana's album cover. Turns out, he MAY be a fucktard, because it didn't even get pulled in the first place, and it is still on sale in physical and digital form despite those things that MAY be problems. Got it?
4. Eat a bowl of fuck.
Whoop Whoop Bonesaw Wizardstick :
SPOOKYtheFUNGI, Radam10:49 am
April 4, 2017
There are 3 types of people in the world. There are the people who watch a ghost show and fully believe everything they hear. There are people who wont believe anything, even when the proof is right there in their face. Then there are people like me, who are open to the idea of something but don't believe it until I see it for myself.
Sorry but I don't just take the word of some weird fucker, who types in all caps, as gospel.
Maybe Lyte is off Psychopathic, maybe he isn't but I can guarantee I wont be taking a word this guy says as truth.
If you make 100 retarded accusations and raise another 100 conspiracy theories, one of them is bout to either be true or become true.
Whoop Whoop Noawareness :
SPOOKYtheFUNGI11:01 am
April 25, 2017
Bonesaw Wizardstick said
1. So it was stated by Bukshot that Billy Bill was the one who pulled the trigger on the UGA feature, and Bukshot speculated that was direct orders from J. This was never confirmed.
So Billy Bill did that on his own? Sorry I'm not buying.
2. Tech N9ne is not relevant to that situation whatsoever. Why didn't you bring up King Iso? He's on that track. Or are you just trying to incite extra drama between the major players? Of course you are.
I forgot about King Iso. So what? How does that prove in your head I'm trying to sow discord between Tech 9 and somebody else you're not even naming and just calling "major players"? Who specifically are you talking about that you think I want Tech 9 to beef with? lol.
“May” = not confirmed
Yeah. And? Chuck Reeves was wrong about Ouija. He was wrong about Will Sigler and I admitted so when I changed my mind after CPN and others brought out other facts. So what?
11:04 am
April 4, 2017
11:05 am
April 25, 2017
Noawareness said
Maybe Lyte is off Psychopathic, maybe he isn't but I can guarantee I wont be taking a word this guy says as truth.
Nobody is saying you should. I only posted the video because someone was speculating that Lyte may be gone. So I cited possible reasons it could be the case. If I'm wrong on the UGA thing being a justified reason for Lyte (and a lawyer) thinking that would be a good enough reason to throw his Lyte's psychopathic records contract out, then fine. If Chuck is wrong about the pushing back of Lyte's album as being a reason for Lyte to get out of the contract, then fine. Let's just keep an open mind and wait and see. That's all.
Here's another clip from 1 hour 22 minutes at 12 seconds.
11:08 am
April 25, 2017
I ALREADY RELEASED THIS INFO
LYTE DID NOT LEAVE
LYTE WAS RELEASED
LYTES' OUT'... SO TO SPEAK
FFF WAS PUSHED BACK BECAUSE LYTE HAD TO BE SCRUBBED OFF A FEW TRACKS
He was released? When and what date? I ask because that Reeves video of him on the Tales from the Lotus Podcast comes from August. If Lyte is gone, that only proves Chuck was right that Lyte had grounds to terminate the contract. ICP probably didn't want to deal with another lawsuit and they just let him go on easy terms.
12:01 pm
April 18, 2017
vinyllover said
Bonesaw Wizardstick said
1. So it was stated by Bukshot that Billy Bill was the one who pulled the trigger on the UGA feature, and Bukshot speculated that was direct orders from J. This was never confirmed.So Billy Bill did that on his own? Sorry I'm not buying.
2. Tech N9ne is not relevant to that situation whatsoever. Why didn't you bring up King Iso? He's on that track. Or are you just trying to incite extra drama between the major players? Of course you are.
I forgot about King Iso. So what? How does that prove in your head I'm trying to sow discord between Tech 9 and somebody else you're not even naming and just calling "major players"? Who specifically are you talking about that you think I want Tech 9 to beef with? lol.
“May” = not confirmed
Yeah. And? Chuck Reeves was wrong about Ouija. He was wrong about Will Sigler and I admitted so when I changed my mind after CPN and others brought out other facts. So what?
Not too quick, are ya?
Point 1. You're not buying. K. Re-read what I said. You made shit up and I stated what is known. Don't know what you want on that.
Point 2. Are you that thick? Well I could IMAGINE that if Violent J didn't want Lyte to work with Tech N9ne as you stated, that would make Violent J and Tecn N9ne the "major players," yeah? Because you totally don't love drama and posting endlessly about it or anything like that. Never.
Point 3. Then why do you insist on bringing his videos up on literally every topic that you get involved in? He's shown to be wrong in situations where he makes shit up and acts like he's not making shit up. That's what he's presumably doing here, or you would have elaborated a lot more about what he actually said.
Whoop Whoop Bonesaw Wizardstick :
SPOOKYtheFUNGI12:08 pm
April 25, 2017
I could IMAGINE that if Violent J didn’t want Lyte to work with Tech N9ne as you stated
Here is my statement:
considering that Joe Bruce also forbade Lyte to be on the the UGA project with Twiztid and Tech 9
Joe Bruce forbade Lyte to be on a project that Tech 9 was part of. I never said Joe Bruce forbade Lyte to be on that project because Tech 9 was on there. That's your fuckup. I am saying that Joe Bruce forbade Lyte to be on the project because TWIZTID was on there. Not because of Tech 9. Now while it is my fault for not using language that was this specific the first time, your interpretation of me saying Joe Bruce didn't want Lyte on there because Tech 9 was on there is false - as well as not being the only possible meaning. That's your fuckup.
Then why do you insist on bringing his videos up on literally every topic that you get involved in?
Because in this case, he was claiming to have good reasons to think Lyte would be leaving Psychopathic Records. Thus it was relevant to this specific topic.
He’s shown to be wrong in situations
Including the Will Sigler one, which I spent more posts than anyone on this forum trying to unravel all the claims against him. In the middle of the damn topic, I changed my mind and sided with CPN. So thank you for acknowledging that I was aware of Reeves' past mistakes. If you want to debate other mistakes of his, I'm fine with that. I'm not afraid to debate anything. For example, if he truly said Ouija could face a copyright claim for his cover that looks like Nirvana's Nevermind, that would be hard to legally prove because it could be argued that it's just a homage. Besides Ouija is not taking money away from the estate of Kurt Cobain, the remaining members of Nirvana or Geffen records with such a cover. And his cover has enough distortions and changes from the original that nobody is going to mistake his cover for Nevermind. So yes, if you can provide the direct quote from Chuck Reeves on that, I would be interested. Because if he said anything like you said he did, then obviously Chuck would be in error.
12:23 pm
June 24, 2016
LOOK GUYZ
OUIJA IS THE ONLY ARTIST PSY HAS SIGNED RECENTLY THAT " GETS IT"
IF ICP PUTS YOU ON THE HATCHET, THEY OWE YOU NOTHING ELSE. PERIOD
THIS AINT THE RAP LOTTERY WHERE DR DRE AND HIS BF WALK UP AND GIVE LITTLE WHITE BOYS MTV RAP CAREERS
THIS IS THE OG INNER CITY POSSE HUSTLERS
YOU STILL GOTTA WORK AND BY WORK THAT DONT MEAN JUST 'RAPPING'
IF ICP WANTS BLOWJOBS FROM YOU NIGHTLY, THEN YOU BETTER DELIVERY!! THE HATCHET AINT NO FREE RIDE!
MUCH MUCH MUCH LOVE + RESPECT THE PSYCHOPATHIC MUTHAFUKKKIN RECORDS, VIOLENT J, 2 DOPE, JUMP, AND THE WHOLE CREW!!
Whoop Whoop kukluxklown :
SPOOKYtheFUNGI, Radam12:38 pm
April 18, 2017
vinyllover said
Joe Bruce forbade Lyte to be on a project that Tech 9 was part of. I never said Joe Bruce forbade Lyte to be on that project because Tech 9 was on there. That's your fuckup. I am saying that Joe Bruce forbade Lyte to be on the project because TWIZTID was on there. Not because of Tech 9. Now while it is my fault for not using language that was this specific the first time, your interpretation of me saying Joe Bruce didn't want Lyte on there because Tech 9 was on there is false - as well as not being the only possible meaning. That's your fuckup.
Why mention Tech at all is what I'm saying. Also, why do you insist on calling J "Joe Bruce," but you don't refer to Tech as Aaron Yates?
Whoop Whoop Bonesaw Wizardstick :
SPOOKYtheFUNGI12:42 pm
June 24, 2016
Bonesaw Wizardstick said
vinyllover said
Joe Bruce forbade Lyte to be on a project that Tech 9 was part of. I never said Joe Bruce forbade Lyte to be on that project because Tech 9 was on there. That's your fuckup. I am saying that Joe Bruce forbade Lyte to be on the project because TWIZTID was on there. Not because of Tech 9. Now while it is my fault for not using language that was this specific the first time, your interpretation of me saying Joe Bruce didn't want Lyte on there because Tech 9 was on there is false - as well as not being the only possible meaning. That's your fuckup.
Why mention Tech at all is what I'm saying. Also, why do you insist on calling J "Joe Bruce," but you don't refer to Tech as Aaron Yates?
EXACTLY THIS ISSUE HAS 0 <--- ZERO ---> TO DO WITH T9
THESE KIDZ ARE JUST THAT FAR OFF THEZE DAYZ
ITS NO WONDER TECH WANTS DISTANCE FROM THIS AUDIENCE
Whoop Whoop kukluxklown :
SPOOKYtheFUNGI1:07 pm
April 25, 2017
Why mention Tech at all is what I'm saying. Also, why do you insist on calling J "Joe Bruce," but you don't refer to Tech as Aaron Yates?
Why not mention Tech? He was on the track. All I know is Tech and Twiztid were supposed to be on the track together and Lyte was slated to be but wasn't. So what? Why are you making a mountain out of a molehill and trying to construct some conspiracy theory that I want/wish for Tech and Lyte to beef? This is absurd. Secondly, Billy Bill doesn't have direct beef with Twiztid. ICP and Rob Bruce (Jump Steady) do. So don't be so foolish as to think there is no way any of the Bruce brothers ordered Billy Bill to do that. If the Bruce brothers didn't object to Lyte being on a track with Twiztid, why didn't they reverse what Billy Bill said? You're being naive.
Secondly, I'll call Joe Bruce whatever the fuck I want (since I'm not talking about how he performs as Violent J) because Joe Bruce is pulling some fuckboy shit by instructing someone else to get Lyte off that track just because Twiztid was on it. Free speech. Find something else to bitch about that matters.
Like the fact that Lyte has had his album pushed back once already and probably twice now to make sure FFF comes out first and that this could be a possible reason to get out of the Psychopathic Records contract as Chuck Reeves pointed out. Reeves said he heard Lyte was looking for a lawyer. So that's Reeves not revealing his sources.
1:17 pm
Moderators
May 22, 2012
1:18 pm
April 25, 2017
Nice job at quote mining. I have no problem with conspiracy theories per say. Just certain ones. If people have a problem with mine, I don't object. You're focusing on the wrong aspect. I specifically asked where the evidence is that I want Tech and Lyte to beef? So far, nobody can answer that. LOL.
1:20 pm
Moderators
May 22, 2012
1:27 pm
September 1, 2014
Bonesaw Wizardstick said
vinyllover said
I dunno, but here's an irrelevant video. I have no opinions of my own. Derp.You just don't get it. GTFO. I 100% guarantee you that no one is going to watch that. Especially since you say:
vinyllover said
Well considering that his new album was supposed to come out in December after ICP's FFF dropped in October, but they pushed it back AGAIN, just because they pushed FFF back, and considering that Joe Bruce also forbade Lyte to be on the the UGA project with Twiztid and Tech 9, at least one of those actions by Joe Bruce may have violated the contract Lyte signed and so Lyte may have been, or may be talking to a lawyer.1. So it was stated by Bukshot that Billy Bill was the one who pulled the trigger on the UGA feature, and Bukshot speculated that was direct orders from J. This was never confirmed.
2. Tech N9ne is not relevant to that situation whatsoever. Why didn't you bring up King Iso? He's on that track. Or are you just trying to incite extra drama between the major players? Of course you are.
3. "May" = not confirmed. Keep in mind that Reeves said that Gutterwater got pulled because it MAY have had an uncleared sample, and had copyright violations with Gang Green's album name and Nirvana's album cover. Turns out, he MAY be a fucktard, because it didn't even get pulled in the first place, and it is still on sale in physical and digital form despite those things that MAY be problems. Got it?
4. Eat a bowl of fuck.
Also Chuck said we may be witnessing the last breaths of a dying beast when J had to cut a set short a little while ago. This lead to so many rumors and speculations J had to make a statement to counter it.
People who use CPN and Cuck as references need to understand their entire viewer ship depends on shock-and-awe and Drama because with out it both are very boring people.
1:30 pm
April 18, 2017
vinyllover said
Why not mention Tech? He was on the track. All I know is Tech and Twiztid were supposed to be on the track together and Lyte was slated to be but wasn't. So what? Why are you making a mountain out of a molehill and trying to construct some conspiracy theory that I want/wish for Tech and Lyte to beef?
Nope. I said J and Tech.
Rob Bruce (Jump Steady)
Thanks. Had nooooooo idea who that was just by the real name /s
So don't be so foolish as to think there is no way any of the Bruce brothers ordered Billy Bill to do that. If the Bruce brothers didn't object to Lyte being on a track with Twiztid, why didn't they reverse what Billy Bill said? You're being naive.
I never said that. I stated what Bukshot said about it. You're adding things to it that we have no way of knowing, so this is your fuck up.
Secondly, I'll call Joe Bruce whatever the fuck I want (since I'm not talking about how he performs as Violent J) because Joe Bruce is pulling some fuckboy shit by instructing someone else to get Lyte off that track just because Twiztid was on it. Free speech. Find something else to bitch about that matters.
We're also not talking about Lyte performing. We're talking about whether or not he's leaving the label. So you should call him Eddie and just save "Lyte" for when you speak about his music.
Like the fact that Lyte has had his album pushed back once already and probably twice now to make sure FFF comes out first and that this could be a possible reason to get out of the Psychopathic Records contract as Chuck Reeves pointed out. Reeves said he heard Lyte was looking for a lawyer. So that's Reeves not revealing his sources.
That's pretty typical, really. Can't reveal what doesn't exist.
Whoop Whoop Bonesaw Wizardstick :
SPOOKYtheFUNGI, bozodklownMost Users Ever Online: 591
Currently Online:
89 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
The Warlock: 11663
King Lucem Ferre: 9098
Old Mr Dangerous: 8974
krunk: 8060
OCJ_Brendan: 6148
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 755
Members: 3743
Moderators: 6
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 5
Forums: 28
Topics: 12299
Posts: 245363
Newest Members:
loppoxz, morbidmikey, Promotionalows, JustinvamModerators: GanjaGoblin: 2873, Psyral: 4297, bozodklown: 394, scruffy: 11447, PunkRockJuggalo: 6559, Pigg: 6492
Administrators: admin: 1, ScottieD: 845