Quit arguing what the fuck the specifics are…cuz they are irrelevant.

Try saying that in court and you will be laughed out of it by the judge and have your case dismissed, dummy.

It’s all about how cops use things to bend(break) the rules to justify their actions

If you're finally admitting the cops abused Juggalos' constitutional rights, but they had no justification to do it because they never had sanction in the 2011 NGIC report since no final agency directive was in fact recommended, YOU JUST LET THE FBI OFF THE HOOK and focused the blame where it should be. THE COPS WHO ABUSED, MISINTERPRETED AND ADDED THINGS INTO THE REPORT THAT WEREN'T THERE. In other words, specifics DO count.

He will then stop me and try to ID me… I will ask if I’m being detained and he will likely say yes. When I ask for what, he will ask for my ID in a rude and angry way again. At that point if I refuse to provide my ID, he will then throw me up against his car and illegally search me and violate my rights

Which means you subpoena his body cam footage and use that as proof that the case should be thrown out. Then you file a countersuit.

During the search he finds weed crumbs in my pocket and then charges me with possession. After talking with his captain and/or other officers, they justify violating my rights by saying I’m suspicious cuz I’m apart of a hybrid gang. Lucky me gets a misdemeanor on my record, a days loss of pay for going to court instead of work, and 243 dollars in fines.

Which means you subpoena his body cam footage and use that as proof that the case should be thrown out. Then you file a countersuit.

When you get your day in court in your countersuit, you point out that the FBI report says that traditionally Juggalos are music fans and are only a gang in four states. In other words, this means the majority of Juggalos are law abiding non gang related people. You point out that he did not fully explain why he was detaining you. The cop will claim he told you (clothes, tattoos, etc), but by this point you have already issued a subpoena for body cam footage to prove if the cop was lying about that not. You then also point out that according to the laws in your state, in order to qualify as a member of either a hybrid, neighborhood or national gang, you have to be engaged in gang activity. Clothes and logos aren't enough. Especially since the report said that traditionally, Juggalos are only music fans and not gang bangers. Of course the cop will say the clothes are enough to arouse suspicion. "Not according to the state we're in and not according to the quotation in the Endnotes section of the NGIC 2011 report. You don't get to make up your own rules and interpretations. There is no final directive agency action given by the FBI." The judge will then agree with you and throw the case out if he/she is honest and on their oath to uphold the constitution.

By the way, if you had weed on you and possession is illegal, what the fuck are you doing breaking the law? You can't break the law and then claim you are being oppressed as a Juggalo when you are caught. You can if they didn't follow the law when arresting you and detaining you, which permits you to get off on a technicality. That being said, personal responsibility is important. I don't know why Juggalos have to have this explained to them like children.

You can't blame the FBI if the cops misread a report or don't understand it. You and other Juggalos need to prove or show where this 2011 NGIC report caused all Juggalos to be able to have their constitutional rights violated and judges sat back and let it happen when Juggalos launched counter suits to overturn arrests and charges that resulted from an illegal and harassing search. As Monoxide said on brunch n bake last year, find one Juggalo who can show paperwork of any kind.