Thread said

Liberals continue to defend perverts despite their claims that they don’t!

The New Way Forward Act really drives home this point. Forty-four radical members of Congress are currently cosponsoring this attempt to overthrow The Constitution.

…”it’s really impossible to describe just how radical this bill is. If passed, it would remake our immigration system for the express purpose of helping foreign-born criminals live here. The bill would allow people who have committed serious felonies in other countries to move to the United States legally… &… it would require taxpayers to transport deported criminals back into the United States… utter & total insanity…” So, according to this bill, illegal immigrants who are proven rapists, child molesters, & drug dealers not only get to stay here, but taxpayers must pay for those who were deported to return. This is called “The Right To Come Home.”

Defend that, cunts.

YouTube Video Tucker: New Way Forward Act would make it nearly impossible to detain immigrants 

Looking into it, Tucker’s interpretation is a fear mongering farce exploiting the vagueness of the wording.

According to the document it’s ultimately up to a judge to decide if a criminal should be aloud or deported.

Also, I got this from a discussion on it.

I assume by section 3 you mean title 3, which does not makes changes to say CMT’s are exempt. It amends it to remove the distinction but we maintain regulations on felony charges and in regards to multiple offenses(2 or more) as these rules are maintained in 8 U.S.C.1182 and 8 U.S.C. 1227. Child molestation as was reference is a felony and as such immigrants with a child molestation charge are not authorized access to the us under hr 5853.

TITLE III—LIMIT CRIMINAL-SYSTEM-TO-REMOVAL PIPELINE

SEC. 301. CRIMINAL OFFENSES AND IMMIGRATION LAWS.

(a) Inadmissibility Based On Criminal And Related Grounds.—Section 212(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2)) is amended— (1) by striking subparagraph (A); and

(2) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) through (I) as subparagraphs (A) through (H), respectively.

(b) Deportability Based On Criminal Offenses.—Section 237(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A)— (A) by striking clauses (i) and (ii);

(B) by redesignating clauses (iii) through (vi) as clauses (i) through (iv), respectively; and

(C) in clause (iv), as so redesignated, by striking “Clauses (i), (ii), and (iii)” and inserting “Clauses (i) and (ii)”;

(2) by striking subparagraph (B); and

(3) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) through (F) as subparagraphs (B) through (E), respectively. SEC. 302. DEFINITIONS.

(a) Aggravated Felony.—Section 101(a)(43) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)) is amended— (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “means—” and inserting “means a felony, for which a term of imprisonment of not less than 5 years was imposed, that is—”;

(2) in subparagraph (F), by striking “for which the term of imprisonment at least one year”;

(3) in subparagraph (G), by striking “for which” and all that follows through “year”;

(4) in subparagraph (J), by striking “, for which a sentence of one year imprisonment or more may be imposed”;

(5) in subparagraph (P)— (A) by striking “(i)”; and

(B) by striking “and (ii) for which the term of imprisonment imposed (regardless of any suspension of such imprisonment) is at least 12 months”;

(6) in subparagraph (R), by striking “for which the term of imprisonment is at least one year”;

(7) in subparagraph (S), by striking “, for which the term of imprisonment is at least one year”; and

(8) by striking the last sentence.

(b) Conviction.—Section 101(a)(48) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(48)) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking “court” and all that follows through “to be imposed.” and inserting the following: “court. An adjudication or judgment of guilt that has been dismissed, expunged, sealed, deferred, annulled, invalidated, withheld, or vacated, or where a court has issued a judicial recommendation against removal, or an order of probation without entry of judgment or any similar disposition, shall not be considered a conviction for purposes of this Act. No judgment on appeal or within the time to file direct appeal shall be deemed a ‘conviction’ for the purposes of this Act.”; and

(2) in subparagraph (B)— (A) by inserting “only” after “deemed to include”; and

(B) by striking “or confinement” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “ordered by a court of law. Any such reference shall not be deemed to include any suspension of the imposition or execution of that imprisonment or sentence in whole or in part.”.

(c) Particularly Serious Crime.—Section 208(b)(2)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158)(b)(2)(B)(i)) is amended to read as follows: “(i) CONVICTION OF AGGRAVATED FELONY.—For purposes of clause (ii) of subparagraph (A), section 241(b)(3)(B), or any other provision of this Act, only an alien who has been convicted of an aggravated felony for which a term of imprisonment of not less than five years was imposed shall be considered to have been convicted of a particularly serious crime.”.

(d) Applicability.—The amendments made by this section shall apply to— (1) admissions and conduct occurring before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act; and

(2) convictions and sentences entered before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sooo..

Comment
by from discussion
inYangForPresidentHQ

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5383/text

vinyllover said

Yes I know many people on this board don’t have the patience or mental dexterity to read something that’s a little more in depth than ICP rap lyrics or pathetic virtue signaling. I understand that. You don’t have to keep telling me.  I noticed this when people couldn’t refute the stuff I gathered and posted about the “gang list.” LOL. I noticed it once again when KLF kept dodging evidence of Muslim controlled no go zones in Europe, and also when Pigg admitted to dodging posts that I made in response to a series of videos called “the alt-right playbook” that HE HIMSELF POSTED!  

Sooooo, is that a yes or no on if this is fun? 

Pussies don’t like dicks, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes — assholes who just want to shit on everything. Pussies may think they can deal with assholes their way. But the only thing that can fuck an asshole is a dick, with some balls.

The problem with dicks is that sometimes they fuck too much or fuck when it isn’t appropriate — and it takes a pussy to show them that.

But sometimes, pussies get so full of shit that they become assholes themselves… because pussies are only an inch and a half away from assholes.

I don’t know much in this crazy, crazy world, but I do know that if you don’t let us fuck this asshole, we’re going to have our dicks and pussies all covered in shit!

Slumerican502 said
Pussies don’t like dicks, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes — assholes who just want to shit on everything. Pussies may think they can deal with assholes their way. But the only thing that can fuck an asshole is a dick, with some balls.

The problem with dicks is that sometimes they fuck too much or fuck when it isn’t appropriate — and it takes a pussy to show them that.

But sometimes, pussies get so full of shit that they become assholes themselves… because pussies are only an inch and a half away from assholes.

I don’t know much in this crazy, crazy world, but I do know that if you don’t let us fuck this asshole, we’re going to have our dicks and pussies all covered in shit!  

America fuck yeah